The Supreme Court on Monday agreed to list on July 7
a plea filed by the DMK alleging that ministers in the Tamil Nadu government
were "actively influencing" witnesses in the CBI probe into last
year's Karur stampede case.
A partial working day bench of Justices Ahsanuddin
Amanullah and Sheel Nagu agreed to list the matter on Tuesday after senior
advocate Huzefa Ahmadi, appearing for DMK Secretary RS Bharati, sought an
urgent hearing.
The plea also seeks to restrain Tamil Nadu Chief
Minister C Joseph Vijay, state minister Aadhav Arjuna and other accused people
from making public statements on the case and to regulate their interaction
with victims' families during the pendency of the CBI probe.
Ahmadi told the court that witnesses
were being "actively influenced" by ministers in the state government
and expressed apprehension that Vijay's proposed visit to Karur on July 10 to
meet victims' families could affect the investigation.
Ahmadi submitted, "This court directed a CBI
probe. Now, some accused who are now ministers in the present regime are attempting
to actively influence the witnesses. We have filed an application".
He said the petitioner can demonstrate from the
record that witnesses were being influenced.
The bench then said, "We will have it
tomorrow".
The plea referred to reports that the chief minister
is scheduled to visit Karur to distribute government orders, compassionate
appointments and other benefits to the families of the deceased and injured
victims.
Bharathi, who has sought impleadment in a pending
case, submitted that several people initially chargesheeted in the case were
now ministers in the Tamil Nadu Cabinet following the 2026 assembly elections.
The petition also referred to a public statement
allegedly made last week by TVK MLA Aadhav Arjuna, in which he purportedly said
that there was "a score to settle" over the Karur incident and
accused the previous DMK government of having "killed" the people of
Karur through the police.
The plea sought directions to the CBI to register a
complaint and take action against Arjuna's statements, alleging they amounted
to "influencing and tampering with witnesses and impeding the
investigation".
The plea contended that direct interaction with
material witnesses by people connected with the subject matter of the
investigation, or by the political executive while distributing benefits
arising out of the very incident under investigation, could create an
apprehension about the fairness and independence of the investigative process.
On October 13 last year, the top court ordered a CBI
probe into the stampede in which 41 people were killed, saying the incident had
shaken the national conscience and deserved a fair and impartial investigation.
Acting on a plea filed by Vijay's Tamilaga Vettri
Kazhagam (TVK) for an independent probe, the top court had set up a
three-member supervisory committee headed by former apex court judge Ajay
Rastogi to monitor the CBI investigation.
The apex court had suspended the Tamil Nadu
government's directions for the appointment of a Special Investigation Team and
a one-man commission enquiry, and directed the state to extend full cooperation
to the CBI.
Earlier, police said the rally witnessed a turnout
of about 27,000 people -- nearly three times the expected 10,000 -- and blamed
a seven-hour delay in Vijay reaching the venue for the tragedy.