The Supreme Court has directed the Telangana government
and Bharat Heavy Electricals Ltd. (BHEL) to submit original files
concerning allegations of financial irregularities in the Palamuru-Rangareddy
Lift Irrigation Scheme (PRRLIS), a project valued at Rs 35,000 crore,. The
decision comes in response to a public interest litigation (PIL) accusing
officials and contractors of corruption.
The order, issued on December 18 by a bench comprising Chief
Justice Sanjiv Khanna and Justice Sanjay Kumar, mandates the Telangana
government to provide documents related to cost estimation. BHEL has also been
instructed to submit records of its joint venture agreement with Megha
Engineering Infra Ltd (MEIL) and to detail equipment supplied as well as
payments received for the project.
MEIL, which partnered
with BHEL for the irrigation project, has recently been in the spotlight for
its significant contributions to political parties through electoral bonds, a
mechanism for anonymous political funding. The Supreme Court has also been
examining the lack of transparency in the use of these bonds.
What
are the allegations?
Former MLA Nagam
Janardhan Reddy filed the PIL, asserting that PRRLIS suffered from inflated
costs and procedural violations. The scheme, designed to divert 90 thousand
million cubic (TMC) feet of water annually from the Krishna River’s Srisailam
reservoir, aims to irrigate 1.23 million acres across Telangana. Inaugurated on
September 16, 2023, the project involves four pumping stations implemented in
18 packages.
According to ThePrint report, the Telangana government initially
pegged the cost of electro-mechanical (E&M) equipment at Rs 5,960 crore in
a report prepared by the Engineering Staff College of India (ESCI) in 2015.
However, this was allegedly increased to Rs 8,386 crore without following
standard procurement procedures. The news report further mentions that this
unapproved escalation caused a loss of Rs 2,426 crore to the public exchequer.
The petition further alleges that
the state failed to seek national or global quotations for the equipment,
opting instead for a joint venture between BHEL and MEIL, which unduly
benefited the private company.
PIL
dismissed by Telangana HC
Reddy’s PIL was
dismissed by the Telangana High Court, prompting him to approach the Supreme
Court. During the ongoing case, the Telangana government argued that Reddy had
pending petitions in the high court regarding the same project, rendering his
Supreme Court appeal inadmissible under the principle of res judicata. This
legal principle prevents re-litigation of issues already adjudicated or that
could have been raised in previous cases.
In response, Reddy’s
counsel argued that his Supreme Court appeal focuses specifically on corruption
allegations, which have not been meaningfully examined by the high court.
Supreme
Court directive on alleged scam
The Supreme Court’s latest directive for document production follows its
earlier hearing in August 2022, where preliminary objections from the Telangana
government were raised. The court has now asked for detailed submissions to
move the case forward.